We use cookies to improve your website experience. Systematic review and meta-analysis. In time, they grow together into one mass to stabili… To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes and complications of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Chung SK, Lee SH, Lim SR, Kim DY, Jang JS, Nam KS, Lee HY. National Center for Biotechnology Information, Unable to load your collection due to an error, Unable to load your delegates due to an error. Technique and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Epub 2020 May 28. 2003 May 15;28(10):1023-6. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000062965.47779.EB. Study design:  |  Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Radiographic outcome measures included segmental and overall lumbar lordosis, and fusion rates. COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. Studies that included stand-alone ALIFs were excluded. Several comparative studies showed that at the L5-S1 disc level, there was no marked difference between LALIF and the open or mini-open ALIF in terms of short-term efficacy, i. e., operative time, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. Epub 2016 Mar 10. 2019 Mar;5(1):1-12. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.01.08. USA.gov. However, no significant differences in fusion rates were noted between both techniques [odds ratio=0.905; 95% confidence interval, 0.458-1.789; P=0.775]. Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion (LALIF) was first reported in 1995. It was expected to reduce the morbidity of an open ALIF, while maintaining its advantages. 2020 Apr;10(2 Suppl):34S-40S. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable.

USD 719.00 Objective: 48 hours to view or download: eCollection 2019. Conclusions: The search yielded 7 studies totaling 811 patients (ALIF=448, TLIF=363). Br J Neurosurg. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Epub 2016 Mar 1.

This site needs JavaScript to work properly. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828d6ca3.

NLM NIH Results: 2003 Dec;12(6):613-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0526-y. Clinical outcomes measures included Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) score for back pain. Faundez A, Tournier C, Garcia M, Aunoble S, Le Huec JC. Divi SN, Schroeder GD, Goyal DKC, Radcliff KE, Galetta MS, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Kurd MF, Rihn JA, Kaye ID, Woods BR, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK.

A systematic literature search was conducted from six electronic databases. No conclusion regarding either the superiority or inferiority of LALIF to the open or mini-open ALIF can be drawn, because of the lack of data with a high-level of evidence. Eur Spine J. Epub 2003 Oct 17. In general, the principal risk of this type of spine surgery is that a solid fusion will not be obtained (nonunion) and further surgery to re-fuse the spine may be necessary. It was expected to reduce the morbidity of an open ALIF, while maintaining its advantages. 2013 May 20;38(12):E755-62. J Robot Surg. 2010 Feb;12(2):171-7. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09272.

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Summary of background data: ALIF and TLIF are 2 methods of achieving spinal arthrodesis.

3099067 ALIF and TLIF appear to have similar success and clinical outcomes, with different complication profiles. ALIF was also superior to TLIF in restoring overall lumbar lordosis (P<0.001).  |   |   | 

Find NCBI SARS-CoV-2 literature, sequence, and clinical content: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/. 2019 Dec;19(12):1960-1968. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.014. With regard to the complication rate, however, there was a higher incidence of retrograde ejaculation in LALIF. ALIF may be associated with superior restoration of disk height and lordosis, but requires further validation in future studies. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion or ALIF, is a surgery in the spine which enters the spine from the front side of the body (called anterior) to remove a herniated disc or part of it which is placed between two adjacent vertebrae in the lumbar spine. Epub 2015 May 12. 5 Howick Place | London | SW1P 1WG. 5, pp. Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Spinal Implants and Bone Grafts; ALIF (Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion) Video; Other ALIF Considerations. At the L4-L5 and L4-L5/L5-S1 disc levels, the complication rate and conversion rate to open surgery was high in LALIF, and many authors were not impressed with the LALIF at these levels. Objective: Compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). 2016 Jun;40(6):1309-19. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3149-8. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun;50(3):150-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-985144. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!